Reblogged from livinn-like-larrry
women did not shave their armpits until 1920s and their legs until 1943 and both were the direct result of razor companies producing pictures of hairless women to sell razors.
please stop putting hairless women in historic movies just bc OH NO MEN MIGHT NOT GET A BONER WATCHING OUR MOVIE WE CANT HAVE THAT
Okay they’re not trying to be historically accurate, they’re just trying to make a good movie. I wouldn’t pay to see a bunch of hairy girls flaunting themselves
Who is they? and what are you talking about? A lot of movies /directors pride themselves on the fact that they are historically correct, yet the women in their movies are virtually hairless.
Also, hairy girls flaunting themselves? Flaunt??! If it is put into a movie it for historically accuracy, like the OP stated. It’s not hard to understand.
Jesus, you’d swear the world was going to implode if a woman actually was portrayed as hairy, which we actually are if we stopped plucking waxing, shaving ourselves into oblivion. Each to their own and all but adult women should not look like pre-pubescent children.